Given a wave function at t=0, how do you find the wave function at time t?

AI Thread Summary
To find the wave function at time t, the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) can be applied to determine the energy of the given state. Once the energy is known, the time-dependent factor e^{-i\omega*t} can be added, where \hbar*\omega=E. If the initial state is an energy eigenstate, this approach suffices. However, if the state is a linear combination of energy eigenstates, each term must be multiplied by its corresponding phase factor, complicating the summation for a closed formula. This method effectively transitions the wave function from t=0 to t.
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
I am given the following:

A spherically propogating shell contains N neutrons, which are all in the sate

\psi(r,0)=4\piij_{1}(kr)(3/\sqrt{34}Y^{0}_{1}+5/\sqrt{34}Y^{-1}_{1})

at t = 0.

How do we find \psi(r,t)?

My attempt:

I have a few thoughts; could you apply the time-independent schrodinger equation to find the energy of the state? If that is the case then you would simply tack on the factor of e^{-i\omega*t}. Then you would know that \hbar*\omega=E. . . . right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that should do it. With the TISE, and the TDSE factor, I think you can it.
 
This will do if your state is energy eigenstate. If it is a linear combination of energy eigenstates, then you will have to multiply each term by the appropriate phase factor. In this case summation of the new series to get a closed formula may not be easy.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top