Anti-symmetric electron wavefunctions

marcusl
Science Advisor
Messages
2,958
Reaction score
668
I'm reading Harrison's book on Solid State Theory, and he states without explanation that the many-particle wavefunction in a solid must be anti-symmetric with respect to exchange of any two electrons. I guess it may be obvious, but can someone explain why it's anti-symmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons are fermions, you can't have two in the same state. As such, the wave functions for fermions are created to be antisymmetric. That way, if you have two fermions in the same state, the function collapses to zero. because it's the negative of itself.

For bosons this isn't true and you can pack as many as you like into the same state.
 
Thanks. I knew it had to be obvious!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top