How much OH- must be added to achieve desired pH?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsnnewbie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
AI Thread Summary
To determine how much 5 M KOH is needed to raise the pH of 1.0 L of 0.1 M glycine from pH 9 to pH 10, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is utilized to calculate the concentrations of the protonated form (-NH3+) at both pH levels. The addition of KOH neutralizes the protonated glycine, shifting the equilibrium towards the free base (-NH2). By calculating the difference in the amounts of -NH3+ at pH 9 and pH 10, the required stoichiometry can be established to find the volume of KOH needed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the equilibrium and stoichiometric relationships in this acid-base reaction. Accurate calculations will lead to the correct amount of KOH necessary for the desired pH adjustment.
physicsnnewbie
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Glycine which has a pKa of 9.6 can exist in protonated form (-NH3+) or as the free base (-NH2) because of the reversible equalibrium R-NH3+ <------> R-NH2 + H+.

How much 5 M KOH must be added to 1.0 L of 0.1 M glycine at pH 9 to bring the pH to exactly 10?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have spent a couple hours trying to figure this out but don't really know where to start. A couple hints might point me in the right direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you add KOH to pH 9 glycine solution you are in fact neutralizing -NH3+.

Use Henderon-Hasselbalch equation to calculate amount of -NH3+ in solution at pH 9 and 10, then it is a simple stoichiometry.
 
Thanks Borek, very helpful :).
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top