LaTeX Improving Latex Image Quality: Can Anti-Aliasing and Text Size Increase Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TriKri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images Latex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on improving the quality of images generated by LaTeX code, particularly focusing on the need for anti-aliasing to enhance image smoothness and readability. Users express concerns about the current appearance of LaTeX-rendered text, noting that it appears blocky and that small text is difficult to read. Specific issues include the pixel size being larger than regular text and certain characters, like the "T" and the prime symbol, being cut off or not displayed correctly. There is acknowledgment that recent software upgrades and server changes may have impacted image rendering, and while some improvements have been noted, such as increased text size, users still find the images lacking in quality. A previous discussion on this topic is referenced, indicating ongoing efforts to address these issues, although it is clarified that changes will only affect newly generated images, leaving older posts unchanged.
TriKri
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hi!

Is there possible to improve the quality of the images generated by latex code? It should be good if anti aliasing could be turned on, which would produce smooth and fine images. Now, the text looks a little bit awkward in my opinion, since it it all edged, and the small text is hard to read.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, nice!
 
I came here to post the same thing. I don't know what anti aliasing is, but I know it's not looking great right now:

\begin{pmatrix}1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ 0 &amp; \frac{u_x}{u} &amp; \frac{u_y}{u}\\ 0 &amp; -\frac{u_y}{u} &amp; \frac{u_x}{u} \end{pmatrix}<br />

It's like the pixel size is much bigger than in the regular text. And I think the text is a bit too small.

Does this look like an arrow and a "prime"? \vec p&#039; Why does this T get cut off? \begin{pmatrix}a &amp; b\end{pmatrix}^T.
 
As has been mentioned previously, Chroot is looking into the matter. The forum recently had a software upgrade and server move so the admins are still sorting the flak from those two things out.
 
Bump?
 
Actually, a lot of work and experimenting with PF's LaTex was done earlier in the year by chroot. There was an extensive discussion of it, if I can find the thread I'll post a link to it.

EDIT found the thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=314512

Note, my understanding is that any changes only affect newly generated LaTex images. Old posts will always look the same, because the LaTex images have already been generated using the old formatting process.
 
Last edited:
Fredrik said:
I came here to post the same thing. I don't know what anti aliasing is, but I know it's not looking great right now:

\begin{pmatrix}1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ 0 &amp; \frac{u_x}{u} &amp; \frac{u_y}{u}\\ 0 &amp; -\frac{u_y}{u} &amp; \frac{u_x}{u} \end{pmatrix}<br />

It's like the pixel size is much bigger than in the regular text. And I think the text is a bit too small.

Does this look like an arrow and a "prime"? \vec p&#039; Why does this T get cut off? \begin{pmatrix}a &amp; b\end{pmatrix}^T.

Sure, the latex images look much better now since the text size has increased, but they still look a little bit blocky, even though I can see that anti-aliasing has been used. And the T and the end of the arrow still get cut off. I can't see the ' over the p either, but maybe it happens to be hidden by the arrow.

What I can see when I open the matrix image with a photo viewer is that the parenthesis seem to (for some reason?) have only 4 gray scale colors (hence looking a little blocky), while the rest of the formula renders much better since it uses many more gray scale colors. I find it strange that the parenthesis should be rendered with lower quality than the rest of the formula, but I guess it's okay. The parenthesis in the other image though, have more gray scale colors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
22K
Replies
0
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
25K
Replies
0
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
28K
Back
Top