Does Placing a Floating Ball in Water Affect Scale Balance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shyboyswin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Scale
AI Thread Summary
Placing a floating ball in a glass of water on a balanced scale does not affect the scale's balance. When the ball is placed in the water, it displaces a volume of water equal to its weight, causing the water level to rise but not changing the overall downward force on that side of the scale. The buoyant force acting on the ball counteracts its weight, keeping the forces balanced. Both sides of the scale experience equal forces, leading to no change in balance. Thus, the scale remains balanced regardless of the floating ball.
shyboyswin
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This is not homework, but the question is really bugging me. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/i...gmMkfTsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090713211453AAIVYtd"

Here is the problem:

On a scale, you place a glass of water and a ball on each side of the scale. The scale is balanced at this point. If you take the ball on side B of the scale, and place it into the glass of water on side B and the ball floats, will the scale become unbalanced?

Although the posters on Yahoo Answers think that the scale will remain balanced, I think not. The scale only detects the forces acted on each side. Because the ball floats, there is a buoyant force from the displaced water that is preventing the ball to sink to the bottom, thus the ball's force of gravity is not acting on the scale.

For side A:

\Sigma F_A = F_{G}_{water} + F_{G}_{ball}

For side B:

\Sigma F_B = F_{G}_{water} + (F_{G}_{ball} - F_{buoy}) = F_{G}_{water}

Can someone please confirm/correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi shyboy. I'm sorry but the Yahoo guy has it right. Just to make sure there's a clear understanding of the question, I'll copy it here:
Both pans of a balance scale have on them identical cups of water, and identical ping-pong balls. Each ball lies on the pan next to the cup. If one of the balls is placed into the cup of water that is on the same pan with it, so that the ball floats, will the scale become unbalanced? If so, which side will rise up?
When you put something into a container of water like this, there is water displaced. That volume of water must go somewhere, so it rises up. The height of the water in the cylinder then, increases because of what is placed into the water. That increase in the water's height will also increase the pressure on the bottom of the cylinder by an amount equal to the weight of the floating object divided by the area of the bottom of the cylinder.

In other words, the force downwards is due to water pressure integrated over an area, and that pressure increases by an amount that is equal to the weight of the floating ball divided by the cylinder's area.

Note that the volume of water displaced by the object has a weight which is equal to the weight of the object. So this volume of water must rise up in the cylinder exactly the same amount that it would rise if water of this volume were added. We could drop either a ping pong ball in of weight W or add water of weight W to the cylinder, and both of these would cause the water to rise inside the cylinder an equal amount.

It can get very complicated if we talk about a non-cylindrical water container, like an old fashion Coke bottle, but the conclusion is the same. The weight of the object in the water increases the downward force on the scale when the ball is put in by an amount equal to the weight of the ball. Therefore, the scale remains ballanced.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top