Is a Symmetric and Transitive Relation Always Reflexive?

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Statement:
Prove or Disprove: A relation ~ on a nonempty set A which is symmetric and transitive must also be reflexive.


Ideas:
If our relation ~ is transitive, then we know: a~b, and b~a \Rightarrow a~a.
Therefore our relation ~ is reflexive, since b~c and c~b \Rightarrow b~b, and c~a and a~c \Rightarrow c~c.


Proof:
Can the above (idea) constitute a proof in itself?

Thanks,

Jeffrey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I thought about it a little, and came up with a proof. But can someone critique it and let me know if it's actually alright.


Proof
We know ~ is symmetric.
Therefore, \exists a,b,c \in A such that
if a~b, then b~a,
and if b~c, then c~b,
and if c~a, then a~c.​
But we also know our relation ~ is transitive.
Therefore,
if a~b, and b~a, then a~a, (#1)
and if b~c, and c~b, then b~b, (#2)
and if c~a, and a~c, then c~c. (#3)​
By (#1), (#2), and (#3) we know our given relation is reflexive.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top