Maximizing Study Time: How Many Times Should You Review Material?

  • Thread starter Thread starter land_of_ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes Study
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on effective study techniques and the balance between reinforcing known material and learning new concepts. A common belief is that reviewing material six times aids in transferring information to long-term memory. The individual describes a systematic approach to studying, which includes taking lecture notes, transcribing them in detail, and highlighting challenging areas for focused review. This method allows for multiple reviews before tests, enhancing confidence and retention. However, the individual notes that this approach is not applied universally; for subjects of genuine interest, they may delay this structured method until encountering difficulties. This strategy has proven particularly beneficial in humanities courses that require memorization of various names, places, and concepts.
land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
When you are studying are you trying to learn what you don't really get, most of the studying time that you put in, or is that time for you more spent, re-enforcing things you already know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I always heard that you have to go over something 6 times until it becomes stored in long-term memory. I usually take notes during a lecture, that evening I will transcribe them into a better format (in pen), filling in everything in a little more detail. The next day I will simple read them over highlighting the things I could not immediately remember. After that I will review only the highlighted material. Then I will re-review everything and type the notes up clear, compact, and concise. Before any major test I just scan over the notes, and I usually know everything, thus feel more confident on the tests.

That way I go over it at least 6 times before it's needed.

I don't do this for everything though. If it is a subject I am really interested in I won't start this method until I get stuck on something. It helped out a great deal in some of my humanaties courses where I was required to remember names/places/ideas/movements/artists that I really had no interest in.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top