Quick question about differences of energy output for different reactions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the percentages of mass converted to usable energy in various nuclear reactions for a game design project. The user has proposed that uranium fission releases about 0.1% of its mass as usable energy, D-T fusion about 0.7%, and positron-electron annihilation 100%. They seek confirmation of these figures and clarification on whether the percentages should reflect only the energy from the mass actually converted, rather than the total mass-energy conversion. The user emphasizes their need for realistic but not necessarily precise numbers to inform their game design. Accurate feedback on these calculations is requested to ensure they are in the right range.
xx.jason.xx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to set up some realistic conditions for a game I am designing, and need a bit of help. I am speaking very generally in this context.

What are the percentages of mass released as usable energy in a uranium fission reaction, a D-T fusion reaction, and a positron-electron annihilation event. Notice I say USABLE, and these numbers do not have to be exact. I am simply trying to get a realistic basis for some numbers.

The numbers I have so far are these
uranium fission - 0.1% of the mass-energy conversion energy.
D-T fusion - 0.7% of the mass-energy conversion energy
positron-electron - 100%

PLEASE correct me if I have made a mistake.

EDIT:

The percentages represent this:

Take the entire mass of the reactants and convert it completely to energy. The percent is the usable energy from that caclulation. If it should only be the energy from the matter that was ACTUALLY converted, please let me know.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
can someone tell me if my numbers are at least close? I am simply trying to get relatively accurate numbers, not precise figures.

Any help is appreciated.
 
No one can even tell me if I am in the ballpark? I find that kind of hard to believe.

If I am wrong, let me know, and I will recalculate my numbers, but these are the numbers I got when i did my math. I am not looking for someone to do the work for me, I have done it. I just want to confirm my numbers.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top