Pick k (assume k < n) items from the list

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob j
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    List
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of selecting k items from a list of n items, where k is less than n, without knowing the total number of items n and doing so in a single pass. Participants explore methods for achieving this, including storing preliminary picks and using probabilistic selection as they iterate through the list. There is skepticism about the feasibility of the task, particularly regarding the assumption that k is less than n while simultaneously not knowing n. Despite differing opinions on the effectiveness of proposed algorithms, the consensus acknowledges the complexity of the problem. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the intricacies of random selection in unknown-sized datasets.
bob j
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I have a list of n items. My goal is to pick k (assume k < n) items from the list such that each one of them as probability 1/n of being chosen. Would it be possible to accomplish this without knowing n, in one reading?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


bob j said:
I have a list of n items. My goal is to pick k (assume k < n) items from the list such that each one of them as probability 1/n of being chosen. Would it be possible to accomplish this without knowing n, in one reading?

thanks

I don't understand how you can have a list of n items and not know n.

Besides:
Are you picking a subset from a set?
Set from a list?
List from a set?
List from a list?

I think there is a difference.
 


Let's say there is a file composed of n lines. I do not know the number of lines in advance. I wish to pick k random lines from the file, with one read only (without storing the lines in memory and then doing the rest)...
 


bob j said:
Let's say there is a file composed of n lines. I do not know the number of lines in advance. I wish to pick k random lines from the file, with one read only (without storing the lines in memory and then doing the rest)...

I think the best you can do is to pick k random distinct integers from {0,...,m} where m is an arbitary number bigger than k. Order the k integers in a list L.

During your one pass through, process the i-th line if i is an element in L, skip the rest.

Obviously you will not be able to read k lines if the actual value of n > m. But this is the best I can think of.
 


I assume you mean k/n, not 1/n.

bob j said:
I have a list of n items. My goal is to pick k (assume k < n) items from the list such that each one of them as probability 1/n of being chosen. Would it be possible to accomplish this without knowing n, in one reading?

Yes -- but it won't be efficient. Store the first k items as your preliminary picks. Start x as k + 1 and increase it by 1 until you reach the end of the file. For each x, select x with probability k/x. If selected, choose a random number r from 1 to k and replace preliminary pick r with x.
 


CRGreathouse said:
I assume you mean k/n, not 1/n.



Yes -- but it won't be efficient. Store the first k items as your preliminary picks. Start x as k + 1 and increase it by 1 until you reach the end of the file. For each x, select x with probability k/x. If selected, choose a random number r from 1 to k and replace preliminary pick r with x.

What happens if k > n? That to me is the problem...
 


ych22 said:
What happens if k > n? That to me is the problem...

Since the OP said

bob j said:
(assume k < n)

I'm not worried about this case. My program can cause nasal demons if that happens.
 


CRGreathouse said:
I'm not worried about this case. My program can cause nasal demons if that happens.

Oh, fair enough. Then my algorithm should work too.

However this k<n assumption is still pretty suspicious. How can one claim not to know n yet make the claim that k<n? :eek:
 


ych22 said:
Oh, fair enough. Then my algorithm should work too.

Well, yours doesn't pick them with the desired probability. I think that mine does, though I haven't proved it.

ych22 said:
However this k<n assumption is still pretty suspicious. How can one claim not to know n yet make the claim that k<n? :eek:

Perhaps k is small and n is very large. You might know that n is between a million and ten million, and that k is 10.
 
  • #10


CRGreathouse said:
Well, yours doesn't pick them with the desired probability. I think that mine does, though I haven't proved it.



Perhaps k is small and n is very large. You might know that n is between a million and ten million, and that k is 10.

Oh oops. You are right on both counts!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top