Relativistic Velocity: Speed Limits & Ranges Explained

nelufar
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Which velocity can be said to be relativistic velocity? I mean is there any range beyond which velocities can be called as relativistic velocities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All velocities are relativistic, but relativistic effects will not be easily noticeable until the speed is large enough to make

\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

(where v is the speed, and c is the speed of light)

significantly larger than 1.

An example: suppose that v=0.1c, i.e. 10% of the speed of light. Then gamma is about 1.005. Is that significantly larger than 1? That depends on that you're doing. Sometimes a 0.5% correction to the non-relativistic result isn't important, and sometimes it is.
 
Is same true for relativistic energies also?
 
The kinetic energy of a particle is E_{kin.}=(\gamma -1)mc^2 if this deviates substantially from classical kinetic energy you should use the relativistic result.

So you could use as a criterium: if 2 (\gamma -1)c^2/v^2 is significantly larger than 1 you deal with relativistic velocities...
 
Consider the orbital speed of a satellite or spacecraft : ~17,000mph. For an astronaut, this is not a relativistic velocity, meaning he won't notice the time dilation on his watch from takeoff to landing. For a GPS satellite, however, this is a relativistic velocity and must be accounted for in its functioning in order for GPS positions to be accurate.
 
nelufar said:
Is same true for relativistic energies also?
To see the answer to your question it helps to use the series expansion

\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x}}=1+\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{3}{8}x^2+\frac{5}{16}x^3+\dots

The kinetic energy is

(\gamma-1)mc^2=\bigg(1+\frac{1}{2}\bigg(\frac{v^2}{c^2}\bigg)+\frac{3}{8}\bigg(\frac{v^2}{c^2}\bigg)^2+\frac{5}{16}\bigg(\frac{v^2}{c^2}\bigg)^3+\dots-1\bigg)mc^2=\frac12mv^2\bigg(1+\frac34\bigg(\frac{v^2}{c^2}\bigg)+\frac58\bigg(\frac{v^2}{c^2}\bigg)^2+\dots\bigg)

Note that the first term after the last equality sign is just the non-relativistic kinetic energy. The other terms are relativistic corrections to the non-relativistic result. If the speed is large enough these terms can't be ignored.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top