Why is an Electric Current Necessary to Measure the Casimir Effect?

philipp2020
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi

For measuring the casimir effect in a experiment, two conducting plates are set up parallel to each other. As far as I know, in all experiments so far there was always a small electric current induced in both plates.

So my question is: Why is this electric current necessary in such an experiment?

Thank you for an answer.

Philipp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I didnt get any answers to my last post I would like to clarify my question in some
second post.

The main thing I want to focus on is, that there are so many external forces induced into the experiment, with which it becomes difficult to say, if there is Casimir Effect or not, or if it is corresponding with other factors like heat or a magnetic field. Of course I know that you can cancel out the external forces by estimating their noise effect, but wouldn't it be better to bring it as few as possible external forces in the first place?

In my opinion, for measuring the Casimir Effect there are basically only 2 things necassary. Two plates and a container for creating a vacuum. Any other things implemented into the experiment could create some external "noise".

Now when you look at recent experiments for the Casimir Effect like for example here: http://www.mit.edu/~kardar/research/seminars/Casimir/PRL-Lamoreaux.pdf

There is always a electric current inside the conducting plates. An this creates a magnetic field which can influence the plates behaviour. Furthermore in other recent experiments a temperature change on the surface on the plates was induces, which changes the pressure between the plates.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top