How to find the generator of translation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the generators of translation within the Galilei group, specifically for space and time translations. It is noted that while generators for rotations and Galilean transformations can be easily expressed in matrix form, space translations pose a challenge due to their non-linear nature. A proposed solution involves expanding the 4D space to 5D, where an additional dimension maintains a constant value, allowing for the construction of a matrix representation. The generator for space translations is suggested to be e^{i \hat{p}a/\hbar}, though clarity on the definition of a generator is sought. The conversation concludes with the assertion that a matrix representation can indeed be derived under these conditions.
kakarukeys
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
The Galilei group contains rotations, Galilean transformations, space translation and time translation.

It is easy to work out generators for rotations and Galilean transfromations in matrix form.

And they obey:
[J^i, K^j] = i \epsilon^{ijk}K^k

Can one work out the generator for space translation, P? so that one can show explicitly that:

[K^i, P^j] = 0

and same for time translation.
[K^i, H] = i P^i

OR

there is no matrix form for these two generators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody else has taken a shot at this, so I'll put my $.02 in, though I'm afraid I can't give you as definite an answer as you'd like (well, for that matter, as I'd like).

Usual matrix notation is linear, so you can write down (x,y) -> ax + by in matrix form. However, you want to write a transform of the form x -> x+a. This isn't a linear tranform. It appears to me that you can do this by just defining a "variable" that's equal to a constant. To avoid winding up with non-square matrices, you'll have to add a dummy line, that describes how a constant transforms. Well, a constant is always equal to itself, it doesn't depend on the other variables, so the matrix entry for how a constant transforms will have to say that it's equal to 1 x itself, no other variable affects it.
 
Isn't the generator for space translations e^{i \hat{p}a/\hbar}? Or is a generator something different?
 
I do not quite understand what you said.
But I found the answer.
The matrix can be found by expanding the 4D space to 5D, provided that x_5 is always 1.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top