Raoult's Law, Finding an unknown compound

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glitche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the identity of compound X based on its boiling point elevation in a 1.00m aqueous solution. The boiling point elevation constant for water is provided as 0.52, leading to a calculated change in boiling point of 1.04 degrees Celsius. This change suggests that two particles are present in the solution, as indicated by the calculation of 1.04/0.52 = 2. The participant hypothesizes that KCl (potassium chloride) is the likely candidate for compound X due to its dissociation into two ions. The discussion concludes with a request for confirmation of this reasoning.
Glitche
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. A 1.00m aqueos solution of compound X had a boiling point of 101.04 Celsius. Which one of the following could be compound X? The boiling point elevation constant for water is 0.52

A) CH3CH2OH
B) KCL
C) C6H12O6
D) NA3PO4




ΔTb=(Kb)(m)




1: identify the change in bp temperature. in this case, it's 101.04-100 = 1.04 degrees C.
2. divide this change by your bp elevation constant. 1.04/0.52 = 2

so now I think that means that two different molecules were added. My guess is it was KCl (potassium chloride). but of course, I'm not entirely sure =/

Can someone help me out?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK to me.
 
Thanks Borek!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top