Differentiation of a vektorfield

  • Thread starter Thread starter klabautermann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
klabautermann
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
hi!

i flipped through my notes on a class on general relativity this morning and i found an expression which doesn't make sense to me. I am not sure if don't understand the last term in the last equality or it just dosn't make sense. i would appreciate your oppinion.
a,b are abstract indicies. everything else are coordinate indicies.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You should explain your notations...
 
of course. as i said, a and b are abstract indicies, i,j,m,k are components with respect to a basis. bared and not bared components and differential operators correspond to different coordinate systems.
 
Ok but what are \partial<sub>a</sub>, the quotation? x is a vector?
 
\partial_{a}
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top