Speed of a Cumulative Compound DC Motor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the speed equation for a Cumulative Compound DC motor, specifically the formula ω = K(Vt - IA[RA + RF)/(\PhiP + \PhiS). Participants question how to calculate the constant K and whether the terminal voltage Vt should be replaced with armature voltage Ea. There is also debate about the nature of torque-speed curves, with opinions suggesting they are neither perfectly linear nor exponentially decaying, as they may vary based on the motor's internal friction and design. Understanding the formula and its variables is essential for accurate analysis. The conversation highlights the complexity of motor performance characteristics.
mobin.abrar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I came across an equation for the Speed ω in Radians/seconds of a Cumulative Compound DC motor.

ω= K(Vt-IA[RA+RF)/(\PhiP+\PhiS)

  • How would we calculate K in this equation?
  • Shouldn't the Terminal Voltage Vt be replaced by Armature Voltage Ea?
  • I came across a lot of varying torque speed curves. WIll the curve be exponentially decaying or linear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you should explain your formula and the used variables, or at least give its source.
My guess: K is some constant given by the geometry of the motor.

I came across a lot of varying torque speed curves. WIll the curve be exponentially decaying or linear?
I don't think that any of these curves are perfectly exponentially or linear. In addition, it might depend on the motor (e.g. how its internal friction depends on the angular velocity).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top