Fortran Fortran, why do i suddenly get new errors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snipertje
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors Fortran
AI Thread Summary
Subroutines in Fortran do not return values; instead, they modify variables passed to them. In the discussed scenario, the user attempted to use a subroutine to compute values of y based on varying t, but only received a single value because the subroutine was called outside of the loop. To achieve the desired functionality, the subroutine must be called within the loop for each iteration, allowing y to be recalculated with the updated value of t. It was clarified that using a function would be more appropriate if a return value is needed. The final understanding was that y must be recalculated in each loop iteration to reflect the new value of t.
snipertje
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Do subroutines return values only?

Sorry for the wrong title!

I currently have a subroutine which should return y like (the actual formula is a bit more complex): y=cos(t)

When i call the subroutine and then make a do-loop to test y for different t, it gives 1 value only. Does the subroutine give a value to y or am I doing something else wrong?

t doesn't have a value before the subroutine is called.
 
Last edited:
Technology news on Phys.org


snipertje said:
Sorry for the wrong title!

I currently have a subroutine which should return y like (the actual formula is a bit more complex): y=cos(t)

When i call the subroutine and then make a do-loop to test y for different t, it gives 1 value only. Does the subroutine give a value to y or am I doing something else wrong?

t doesn't have a value before the subroutine is called.
Fortran subroutines don't return values. By that, I mean that an expression that includes a subroutine call doesn't evaluate to anything.

Your routine should be a FUNCTION, which does return a value.
 


Mark44 said:
Fortran subroutines don't return values. By that, I mean that an expression that includes a subroutine call doesn't evaluate to anything.

Your routine should be a FUNCTION, which does return a value.
I have something like this, it's not about wether or not a subroutine is needed, I want to understand how it works.

Code:
call asd(y,t,a)
do i=1,10
t=i
test(i)=y
end do

subroutine asd(y,t,a)
y=a*cos(t)
end
For some reason test(i) gives the same value for every i, whereas the following works as i want it to, note that t doesn't have a value before the subroutine call.
Code:
do i=1,10
t=i
test(i)=a*cos(t)
end do
 
Last edited:
If your first code you only call the subroutine once. You need to call it inside the loop like this.
Code:
do i=1,10
    t=i
    call asd(y,t,a)
    test(i)=y
end do
You don't really need the variable y. You could do
Code:
do i=1,10
    t=i
    call asd(test(i),t,a)
end do
(Note, you DO need t, because by default t is a real variable and i is an integer, so
call asd(y,i,a) won't work. (It will probably compile, but give you the wrong answers).
 
AlephZero said:
If your first code you only call the subroutine once. You need to call it inside the loop like this.
Code:
do i=1,10
    t=i
    call asd(y,t,a)
    test(i)=y
end do
You don't really need the variable y. You could do
Code:
do i=1,10
    t=i
    call asd(test(i),t,a)
end do
(Note, you DO need t, because by default t is a real variable and i is an integer, so
call asd(y,i,a) won't work. (It will probably compile, but give you the wrong answers).
Ok, thanks I think I get it now. As soon as y has a value it's no longer a*cos(t), so by taking the subroutine in the loop, y get's redeclared as a*cos(t) every single loop, after which y can be calculated with a new t again.
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

Similar threads

Back
Top