Solving stochastic differentials for time series forecasting

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving stochastic differential equations for time series forecasting, specifically a model involving state variables S, y, and v, influenced by Wiener processes. The user is attempting to reproduce results from a paper but lacks familiarity with differential equations and stochastic calculus. They initially attempted to substitute dt with Δt, realizing this approach was flawed due to the correlation parameters. Participants suggest that while the equations can be solved analytically, numerical methods may be more appropriate for those unfamiliar with the concepts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the stochastic terms and their Gaussian distributions for accurate forecasting.
jjhyun90
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am trying to reproduce results of a paper. The model is:

<br /> dS = (v-y-\lambda_1)Sdt + \sigma_1Sdz_1 \\<br /> dy = (-\kappa y - \lambda_2)dt + \sigma_2 dz_2 \\<br /> dv = a((\bar{v}-v)-\lambda_3)dt + \sigma_3 dz_3 \\<br /> dz_1dz_2 = \rho_{12}dt \\<br /> dz_1dz_3 = \rho_{13}dt \\<br /> dz_2dz_3 = \rho_{23}dt \\<br />
where S, y, and v are state variables and z_1, z_2, z_3 are Wiener processes.

The parameters \kappa, a, \bar{v}, \lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3, \sigma_1, \sigma_2, \sigma_3, \rho_{12}, \rho_{13}, \rho_{23} are given. There is time series data such for each day I can estimate S, y, and v.

The goal is to estimate the next day's S, y, and v. It feels like an easy task, but am not familiar with differential equations or Wiener processes (let alone stochastic calculus). Without understanding the model, I was naively trying to "substitute" dt with Δt, etc, but the given parameters are such that \rho_{12} &gt; 0, \, \rho_{23} &gt; 0, \, \rho_{13} &lt; 0, so I realized I should not do that.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to solve the equations numerically? I think people typically interpret the dt as a small timestep Δt. I guess the tricky part is the stochastic terms - it looks like they should be Gaussian distributed random variables with covariances \rho_{12}, etc? Generating those might be tricky? Otherwise everything else looks straightforward.

The equations are simple enough to solve analytically, but if you're not familiar with differential equations that might not be the best avenue for you. But, if you want to try, you can solve the y and v equations using integrating factors, and then plug the solutions into the S equation, which you can solve by dividing out the S and writing dS/S = d(\ln S), then it's a simple matter of integration. (I would write dz_1/dt = \eta_1(t), etc.)
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top