Raman: Why does only some light scatter inelastically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter perels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Raman
perels
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have been involved in a Raman Scattering project and have grasped the fundamentals of Raman Scattering. I'm no physics student, but rather a business student.

1. Can somebody explain to me why only a few protons scatter inelastically and not all of them?
2. Is there a method for defining how many protons will scatter inelastically, i.e. can it be predicted?
3. Any suggested reading material on this subject?

Hoping for some help on at least some of the questions :-)

Cheers
Per
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Thanks for the link - I will look into this - usually I try to avoid wikipedia as the information on this is not verified.

Yes, I mean photons, not protons - thanks for the correction :)
 
perels said:
Hi,

Thanks for the link - I will look into this - usually I try to avoid wikipedia as the information on this is not verified.

Yes, I mean photons, not protons - thanks for the correction :)

Actually the information on wikipedia is very accurate. Studies show (think one was published in nature even) that wikipedia has about as few errors as Encyclopædia Britannica.

Also, on topic, the reason why not all photons scatter is easily answered, it's because this process is probabilistic, as most processes at that quantum level are. One can compute the probability for a scattering event to occur however, but depending on the material they scatter from, this may be a very involved calculation.
 
We can describe the distribution of these energy states with the Boltzmann Distribution with:

<br /> \frac{{{N}_{i}}}{N}=\frac{{{exp}({\frac{{{\epsilon }_{i}}}{{{k}_{B}}T}}})}{Z(T)}\<br />

Where the partition function Z(T) is defined as:

<br /> Z(T)=\sum{{{e}^{-\frac{{{\varepsilon }_{i}}}{{{k}_{B}}T}}}}<br />

This means that there are more electrons in the ground state, thus more Stokes-shifted photons. It also means that a smaller fraction of the molecules are not in the ground state, but in vibrational excited states. Scattered photons from these molecules have higher energy compared to the incident photons. This is called anti-Stokes scattering. This blue shifted scattering is always weaker, due to the Boltzmann distribution, than the Stokes-shifted scattering.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top