Classical physics vs quantum physics

jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
Why do we say that classical physics is a lot different from quantum physics?

The laws that determine the macroscopic world should be derivable from quantum laws. So in a way the Newtonian or classical laws are basically quantum laws( maybe a bit approximated)
So why differentiate between macroscopic and microscopic world?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do we say that classical physics is a lot different from quantum physics?
We don't (except by mistake). We say that quantum physics is different from classical physics :)

All dogs may be animals but not all animals are dogs.
All classical physics is a consequence of quantum - but not all quantum physics can be described classically.

Technically - classical physics is what QM does on average ... so the math is different.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top