Lagrange's Four-Square Theorem: 8n-1 Sum of 4 Squares?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karpmage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Squares Sum
AI Thread Summary
Lagrange's four-square theorem asserts that every natural number can be expressed as the sum of four integer squares. The discussion highlights that the first few values of the form 8n-1 can only be represented as the sum of four squares and questions if this holds true for all n. It is noted that the possible square values modulo 8 are 0, 1, and 4, which limits the combinations to achieve certain sums. Specifically, the number 7 can only be formed using four squares in one way, illustrating the constraint. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical principles behind these observations and seeks clarification on modular arithmetic's role in this context.
karpmage
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Lagrange's four-square theorem states that any natural number can be expressed as the sum of four integer squares. I've noticed that the first few values of 8n-1 can all only be expressed as a minimum of the sum of four squares. Is this true for all values of n? What's the proof behind it? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karpmage said:
Lagrange's four-square theorem states that any natural number can be expressed as the sum of four integer squares. I've noticed that the first few values of 8n-1 can all only be expressed as a minimum of the sum of four squares. Is this true for all values of n? What's the proof behind it? Thanks.

The possible values of squares modulo 8 are 0, 1 and 4. There's only one way to make 7 from 0, 1 and 4 using a maximum of 4 numbers.
 
By what i said i mean

7 = 2^2 + 1^2 + 1^2 + 1^2
15 = 3^2 + 2^2 + 1^2 + 1^2
23 = 3^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1^2
31 = 3^2 + 3^2 + 3^2 + 2^2
etc.

i.e. The first few values of 8n-1 (The first 10 at least) can't be shown as a sum of less than four squares.

Not sure what you mean by modulo 8 and what-not, sorry. You might have to dumb it down a bit for me. What exactly are you trying to say?
 
willem2 said:
The possible values of squares modulo 8 are 0, 1 and 4. There's only one way to make 7 from 0, 1 and 4 using a maximum of 4 numbers.

Sorry, meant to quote you in previous post.
 
Think about clock work math. If it's 11 a.m. and add two more hours we get 1 p.m. You can view this as 11 mod 12 + 2 mod 12 = 1 mod 12. So what he's saying is that the values in mod 8 that are squared can only be 0, 1, and 4. So now if you consider 7 mod 8, you can only get that by adding 1 + 1 + 1 + 4. If you're not familiar with this method:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modula...3osI9mtGGTpQGAAAABAEAADqRgAAgHAAAAAAAALgaAAA=
 
MarneMath said:
Think about clock work math. If it's 11 a.m. and add two more hours we get 1 p.m. You can view this as 11 mod 12 + 2 mod 12 = 1 mod 12. So what he's saying is that the values in mod 8 that are squared can only be 0, 1, and 4. So now if you consider 7 mod 8, you can only get that by adding 1 + 1 + 1 + 4. If you're not familiar with this method:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modula...3osI9mtGGTpQGAAAABAEAADqRgAAgHAAAAAAAALgaAAA=

Ah, I remember now. This came up on a maths test I once did. Completely forgot about it though. Thanks for the help.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top