Solving Inequalities: Tips & Tricks for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter ezsmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities Type
AI Thread Summary
When solving inequalities, the direction of the inequality sign changes only when multiplying or dividing by a negative number. For example, in the inequality 3x ≤ 9, the correct solution is x ≤ 3, not x ≥ 3. It's important to verify solutions by substituting values back into the original inequality to ensure they hold true. Additionally, taking the reciprocal of both sides of an inequality also reverses the inequality sign. Understanding these rules is essential for accurately solving inequalities.
ezsmith
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi, I used to do all this type of inequalities but I have not practice this for almost a year and I have totally forgotten and didn't know why did the sign change.

For example: If it's 3x ≤ 9
The answer: x ≥ 3

Is this right? I have actually forgotten in what circumstances we are suppose to change the inequalities. Input and explanation will be much appreciation. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


It's actually the other way around, i.e., x <= 3.
You can always test your answer. For example if x = 1, then 3x <= 9. But x is not greater than 3. Thus your answer is wrong.

You only change the inequality when the coefficient is negative ( -x > 0 <=> x < 0).
 


Rikardus said:
It's actually the other way around, i.e., x <= 3.
You can always test your answer. For example if x = 1, then 3x <= 9. But x is not greater than 3. Thus your answer is wrong.

You only change the inequality when the coefficient is negative ( -x > 0 <=> x < 0).
More precisely, the direction of the inequality changes when you multiply both sides of the inequality by a negative number. This includes division, as well, since division by a number is the same as multiplying by the reciprocal of that number.

The direction of the inequality changes if you take the reciprocal of each side. For example, 2 < 3, but 1/2 > 1/3.
 


All of these replies got it right. What helped me when I was learning about inequalities, was to treat it like an equal sign. Then the only additional thing to remember when solving them is to change the direction of the inequality any time you multiply or divide the equation by a negative number.

Also, as was pointed out above. you can always check to make sure the answer makes sense by plugging it back in.

good luck!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top