Where Did I Go Wrong in Simplifying this Algebraic Expression?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the simplification of the algebraic expression -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]. The original poster incorrectly distributed the negative sign and mismanaged the signs during simplification, leading to an incorrect result of 5d^2-9d-2 instead of the correct answer of -5d^2-9d+2. Participants highlighted the importance of correctly applying the distribution of negative signs and indicated the need for clarity in notation, particularly with exponents. The correct simplification process involves recognizing that -d^2 combined with -4d^2 results in -5d^2, not a positive value. Overall, the key error was in the handling of signs during the distribution phase of simplification.
uperkurk
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Simplify -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

-d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

d^2[-9d-2+4d^2]

d^2+4d^2-9d-2

5d^2-9d-2

but wolfram says the answer is

-5d^2-9d+2

What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
uperkurk said:
Simplify -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

-d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

d^2[-9d-2+4d^2]
Here is your error- first, you have dropped the "+" in front of the "[" but that may be just a typo- more importantly you have distributed the "-" in front of d^2 into the [9d+(2- 4d^2). Where you were supposed to have -A+ B, you have A- B.

d^2+4d^2-9d-2

5d^2-9d-2

but wolfram says the answer is

-5d^2-9d+2

What did I do wrong?
 
−d2+[9d+(2−4d2)]

−d2+9d+2−4d2

-5d2 + 9d − 2
 
Without any indication that the 2 in d2 is an exponent, what you have here is close to meaningless.
marie.phd said:
−d2+[9d+(2−4d2)]

−d2+9d+2−4d2

-5d2 + 9d − 2
At a minimum, use ^ to indicate exponents, and = for expressions that are equal, like this:

-d^2 + [9d + (2 − 4d^2)]
= -d^2 + 9d + 2 - 4d^2
= -5d^2 + 9d + 2

Even better is to write exponents that actually look like exponents, using the exponent feature that is available when you click Go advanced.

-5d2 + 9d + 2
 
uperkurk said:
Simplify -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

-d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]
-d^2- 4d^2= -5d^2
You seem to be under the impresion that adding two negatives gives a positive. That is not true. That rule only holds for multiplication and division.

d^2[-9d-2+4d^2]

d^2+4d^2-9d-2

5d^2-9d-2

but wolfram says the answer is

-5d^2-9d+2

What did I do wrong?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top