How is a self-adjoint linear operator defined in quantum mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trosten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
trosten
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
How do u define this <u|A|u>? where A is a selfadjoint linear operator.

I have one book that defines is as ||A|u>||^2=<u|A|u>
(equation 2.6 http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap2.ps)

and since ||A|u>||^2 is the length of the vector A|u> squared that is equal to (<u|A)(A|u>).

I have another book (j.j sakurai) that defines it as (<u|)(A|u>)=(<u|A)(|u>)=<u|A|u> but this is the projection of A|u> on |u>.

It seems to me that the two definitions arent equal !? Any ideas? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course,they're not equal,as they involve different "animals".

\langle \psi|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle

is the mean/avrerage of the observable A described by the selfadjoint operator \hat{A} on the quantum state |\psi \rangle
,while the norm
|| \hat{A}|\psi\rangle ||^{2}

involves the matrix element of the SQUARE of the operator...

Daniel.

P.S.The operator is selfadjoint,that's why is the square...
 
Last edited:
I found the solution to the problem myself. If the operator is A=|n><n| then ofcourse AA = (|n><n|)(|n><n|) = |n><n|n><n| = |n><n| = A
Ofcourse repeated projections shouldn't change anything! silly me.
 
OKay,u should have told right from the beginning that u're interested in true and IDEMPOTENT ortogonal projectors... :wink:

Daniel.
 
haha yeah didnt think about that :smile:
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top