What is the difference in mechanisms in which IB1 and IB2 are formed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anhnha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
anhnha
Messages
179
Reaction score
1
Hi,
Can anyone help me? What is the difference in mechanisms in which IB1 and IB2 are formed in the picture below?
attachment.php?attachmentid=61717&stc=1&d=1378970406.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NPN_BJT_Basic_Operation_(Active).svg
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • base current.JPG
    base current.JPG
    10.3 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
valence electrons or free electrons

Hi,
I am a bit confused about base current in BJT transistor. Please help.
Here is a picture from a lecture.
attachment.php?attachmentid=61732&stc=1&d=1379002791.jpg

I want to ask about iB1 (hole injection from B to E).
Holes in base are injected into emitter and then they recombined with electrons in emitter.
Are electrons in emitter that recombine with holes from base valence electrons?
If, for example, all electrons in emitter that recombine with holes from base are free electrons then
hole injected from B to E iEp will not exist, right?
 

Attachments

  • base current 1.JPG
    base current 1.JPG
    50.2 KB · Views: 499
Hi, can anyone help?
 
iB1: holes in Base move from Base to Emitter
This is same as electrons from emitter, recombining with holes in Base to become valance electrons and they continue move to B.
iB2: electrons from emitters recombining with holes in Base and continue move to B
I don't see any difference. Please help.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top