Understanding Inverse Trig Functions: Solving for Phi in Cos Using Inverse Sin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for phi in a cosine function using inverse sine, highlighting confusion about the relationship between trigonometric functions and their inverses. The equation phi = sin^{-1}(c2 / (c1^2 + c2^2)^{1/2}) is derived, leading to phi = tan^{-1}(c2 / c1). Participants clarify that sine and cosine are related through complementary angles, which extends to their inverse functions. The confusion stems from the expectation to use inverse cosine instead of inverse sine, but the mathematical relationships validate the use of inverse sine in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these relationships in trigonometry.
chrisa88
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
How does this work? I'm very confused about the phi is solved using inverse sin.
knowing: A=(c^{2}_{1}+c^{2}_{2})^{1/2} and c_{2}= Acos(\phi)
solve for \phi
which yields: \phi=sin^{-1}\frac{c_{2}}{(c^{2}_{1}+c^{2}_{2})^{1/2}}=tan^{-1}\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}}
I'm not sure how we use the inverse sin to find the phi in the cos function.
I thought to get the inside of the parenthesis of cos you would use inverse cos, or cos^{-1}. Where am I going wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your math expressions are yielding an error here.

Just as there are many trigonometric relationships, so there are apparently just as many relations between their inverses. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_trigonometric_functions

As always, start with the easiest, defining relationships and build out from there. Note that as sine and cosine are related by complementary angles, so are their inverses.
 
I thought this was an error, but the solutions manual to my quantum mechanics class AND the handwritten solutions provided by my professor both have this error. Thank you for confirming!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top