jumpjack
- 223
- 3
If I let pass a line through lower-speed points, I see that 4 points out of 8 match the line:
http://imageshack.com/a/img819/5869/qsub.jpg
A line passing through hi-speed points just matches with 2 point; i reverse the graph for better readibility of next one: now speed is on the X axis and seconds are on Y axis:
http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/469/exym.jpg
Overlapping the known graph of air drag and rolling friction forces, it appears clear why data get non-linear as speed increases:
http://imageshack.com/a/img546/1932/fmhx.jpg
Indeed, at higher speeds the v^2 term prevail.
So probably the low speed data should be used to determine Crr, then the high-speed data and the value of the now-known Crr would allow a precise calculation of Cd.
To be verified.
http://imageshack.com/a/img819/5869/qsub.jpg
A line passing through hi-speed points just matches with 2 point; i reverse the graph for better readibility of next one: now speed is on the X axis and seconds are on Y axis:
http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/469/exym.jpg
Overlapping the known graph of air drag and rolling friction forces, it appears clear why data get non-linear as speed increases:
http://imageshack.com/a/img546/1932/fmhx.jpg
Indeed, at higher speeds the v^2 term prevail.
So probably the low speed data should be used to determine Crr, then the high-speed data and the value of the now-known Crr would allow a precise calculation of Cd.
To be verified.
Last edited by a moderator: