Effects of plasma on friedman/fluid/acceleration equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter dicerandom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Plasma
AI Thread Summary
Plasma effects are often overlooked in cosmology, despite significant plasma mass in structures like the Coma cluster. The discussion highlights the need to consider the impact of plasma on large-scale cosmological dynamics and interactions within galaxy clusters. Magnetic fields generated by plasma may play a crucial yet poorly understood role in structure formation. Limited quantitative results and simulations exist on this topic, indicating a gap in current research. Further exploration of plasma's influence on cosmology could enhance understanding of cosmic structures.
dicerandom
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I'm currently taking a course in introductory cosmology, last quarter I had an introductory course in plasma physics. Something that's been bothering me through the course of my cosmo class is the fact that plasma effects are entirely ignored even though it's acknowledged that, for instance, in the Coma cluster the ratio of intergalactic plasma mass to steller mass is on the order of 10.

I'm wondering what effects taking the mostly-plasma nature of matter into account would have on both large scale cosmology and medium-range effects such as interactions within clusters of galaxies. Could someone point me towards some good (but hopefully still accessable) papers on these subjects?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I think that there is some kind of agreement that magnetic fields produced by plasmas could had played an important role that is not fully understood in cosmological dynamics and structure formation. As far as I know there are actually not many quantitative results and simulations. If you are interested on magnetic fields and stucture formation search for the work of Eduardo Battaner and Estrella Florido of the University of Granada.
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top