Help Solving for x: 246.25 sin x - 676.58 cos x = -27768.42

  • Thread starter Thread starter James_fl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation 246.25 sin x - 676.58 cos x = -27768.42, with participants noting the limitations of sine and cosine values. It is highlighted that the equation may not be solvable as presented, and there is a suggestion that it could stem from an error in derivation. The main focus shifts to a related problem involving a pilot's navigation, requiring the use of Cartesian vector methods to determine the correct heading and travel time. A participant shares their work on the problem, but another points out a mistake in their calculations regarding the division by the plane's speed. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate mathematical methods in solving vector-related problems.
James_fl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello, could anyone help me calculate the value of x?

246.25 sin x - 676.58 cos x = -27768.42

Thank you..

James
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You know the smallest value sin x can have, and the largest value cos x can have. So what is the smallest value 246.25 sin x - 676.58 cos x can have?


(Or are you expected to work with complex numbers?)
 
Ah, yea that's right. it's impossible to solve it.

Well, this equation is derived from somewhere else, and I might have done mistake in doing it.

This is the question:

Use Cartesian vector method to solve the problem. If you use any other method, you will receive zero.

A pilot wishes to fly form city A to city B, a distance of 720 km on a bearing of 70 degree. The speed of the plane is 700 km/h. An 60 km/h wind is blowing on a bearing of 110 degree. What heading should the pilot take to reach his or her destination? How long will the trip take?

Could you help me with this please? I will post my work in 5 minutes.
 
Last edited:
OK, here is my work:

http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h242/jferdina/Bearing.jpg"
http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h242/jferdina/Bearing-continued.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I see it, the last line is wrong, you divided the LSH by 700 but forgot to divide the RHS by 700. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top