How is the number Pi, derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ruko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
AI Thread Summary
The number Pi (3.14159...) is derived from the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. Historically, Archimedes calculated Pi using circumscribed polygons, achieving three-digit accuracy with a 96-sided polygon. Modern calculations of Pi utilize infinite series, a method first formulated in the mid-1600s by Newton. The discussion highlights the evolution of Pi's calculation methods over time. Understanding Pi's derivation showcases both historical and contemporary mathematical techniques.
ruko
Messages
57
Reaction score
1
How is the number 3.14159...etc, derived? I know it has been calculated out to very great lengths and I'm wondering how it's done.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Just find the proportion of radius to circumferance, I believe. I know it is some kind of proportion.
 


My personal favourite:

\frac2\pi = \frac{\sqrt2}2 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt2}}2 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2+\sqrt2}}}2 \cdot \cdots\!

:smile:
 


Modern calculation of pi no doubt use infinite series, first formulated in Newton's time (mid 1600's). Archimedes used circumscribed polygons w/ 96 sides to calculate pi with three digit accuracy.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Is PI (##\pi##) really a number?
Replies
28
Views
2K
I Formal definition of multiplication for real and complex numbers
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Is Riemann's Zeta at 2 Related to Pi through Prime Numbers?
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
I Is e^pi a unique transcendental, or perhaps not transcendental?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Alternating Harmonic Numbers are cool, spread the word!
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Is this method of estimating Pi too similar to Archimedes' method?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Derive Pi: An Easy Guide Without Complex Math
Replies
22
Views
4K
B Find Optimal Int Ratios to Approximate Pi
Replies
7
Views
2K
MHB Do Pi and Geometric Shapes Coexist?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Infinity question about known numbers?
Replies
20
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top