Calculate Skydiver's Velocity After 2 Seconds with k = 1/2 pCdA

  • Thread starter Thread starter chengbin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
To calculate a skydiver's velocity two seconds after opening a parachute, one must solve the differential equation m dv/dt = mg - kv^2, using the initial condition of terminal velocity (50 m/s). Substituting k with 1/2 pCdA and integrating the equation is necessary, as shortcuts using freefall calculations do not yield accurate results. The correct approach involves recognizing that the velocity function must account for the initial condition of v(t=0) = v_0. The resulting expression for velocity over time can be derived through proper integration techniques. Ultimately, a differential equation solver may be needed for those unfamiliar with the calculus involved.
chengbin
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
If a person has reached terminal velocity (say 50m/s), and he opens his parachute, and I want to find his speed 2 seconds after he opens his parachute, can I do this?

Solve the equation m dv/dt = mg - kv^2 and substitute k with 1/2 pCdA and substitute the value for p, Cd, and A to find velocity?

If I can, can I do this shortcut to simplify work?

The proper way of doing it would be to solve this differential equation m dv/dt = mg - kv^2 given the condition when t = 0, v = 50. But solving that would be a lot of work, and it is easy to make a mistake somewhere as my calculus skills is rusty. I can find a solution for m dv/dt = mg - kv^2 for when t = 0, v = 0 from wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity

1ffbd1e8f007cecae13357f5ad624207.png


Substitute my values in, I get a number, let that be x. The velocity of a freefall object with no air resistance after 2 seconds is 9.8(2) = 19.6 m/s. The velocity slowed by drag can be found by 19.6 - x. Then I just do 50 - (19.6 - x) to get my velocity after 2 seconds.

If this doesn't work, is there a differential equation solver that will solve my equation? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't work this way. The expression you have above is the speed as a function of time if the object starts from rest. One needs to go back to the original differential equation and solve it with the initial condition ##v(t=0)=v_0## to get a new expression for ##v(t)##.

The differential equation may be written as ##\frac{dv}{dt}=g-\alpha v^2##. With terminal velocity ##v_T=\sqrt{g/\alpha}##, and after separation of variables, one gets$$\frac{dv}{v_T^2-v^2}=\alpha ~dt$$This can be easily integrated from ##v_0## to ##v## by separating fractions. The result is
$$v(t)=\frac{\frac{v_T+v_0}{v_T-v_0}-\exp(-2 \alpha v_T~t)}{ \frac{v_T+v_0}{v_T-v_0}+\exp(-2 \alpha v_T~t) }v_T.$$You should be able to get your expression from the above equation if you set ##v_0=0## but it's not easy to guess the form of the equation going the other way.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top