How Do Cells Adapt to Changes in Signaling Ligand Concentration?

AI Thread Summary
Cells adapt to changes in signaling ligand concentration through a mechanism involving negative feedback that operates with a delay. This adaptation allows cells to respond to relative changes in ligand concentration rather than absolute levels. When a ligand concentration increases, the cell initially responds strongly, but this response eventually halts due to the negative feedback mechanism. The delay in feedback means that a sudden increase in ligand concentration can still elicit a strong response before the feedback system activates. Understanding this process is crucial for comprehending how cells maintain homeostasis in fluctuating environments.
Ahmed Abdullah
Messages
203
Reaction score
3
"In chemical signaling, adaptation enables cells to respond to changes in the concentration of a signaling ligand (rather than to the absolute concentration of the ligand) over a very wide range of ligand concentrations. The general principle is one of a negative feedback that operates with a delay. A strong response modifies the machinery for making that response, such that the machinery resets itself to an off position. Owing to the delay, however, a sudden change in the stimulus is able to make itself felt strongly for a short period before the negative feedback has time to kick in." -Molecular cell biology ,bruce Albert
I don't understand this paragraph. can anyone clarify this ( best with example , even paraphrasing it may help) ... I have also searched the net, for negative feedback that operate in delay... got nothing helpful.
Any help will be highly appreciated.
 
Biology news on Phys.org


There's all kinds of negative feedback with delay in biosystems. I'm not really sure of context, but this sounds like the desensitization of a ligand-gated channel. The language is kind of arbitrary, though.

Could you provide more context? (chapter topic, perhaps, what kind of material are you looking at?)
 


Pythagorean said:
There's all kinds of negative feedback with delay in biosystems. I'm not really sure of context, but this sounds like the desensitization of a ligand-gated channel. The language is kind of arbitrary, though.

Could you provide more context? (chapter topic, perhaps, what kind of material are you looking at?)

It was trying to explain how cell respond to change in ligand concentration rather than absolute concentration, in general terms. Yap it later talks about desensitization ... but I am unsure how "negative feedback with delay" works and wondering how it helps cell to respond to change in ligand concentration.

I guessed the following may be the case, but I am not sure ... Please correct me if I am wrong.

Suppose the concentration of ligand increase from C1 to C2 , as a consequence (after some intermediate steps) the target (protein or enzyme) increase or decrease it's activity and elicit the response. After certain delay because of negative feedback, the response come to a halt. At this point the existing level of ligand concentration is unable to elicit a response.
But when ligand concentration increases still, it push the existing static state resulted from some sort of equilibrium- toward a response... but eventually the negative feedback take over and halt the response.
I also assume the negative feedback is strongly coupled with the ligand concentration... that is when ligand concentration falls it also withdraw certain extent of negative feedback inhibition.
 
Last edited:


Ok, now it sounds like you're talking about allosteric modulation, whereby the gate had a second, inhibitory binding sit for non-ligand (i.e. for allosteric modulation)

I think, if the local concentration of ligand changes, it changes the energy landscape of the protein, which changes the on-off rates of allosteric modulators.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top