Need help for a prove about magnetic field and magnetic force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the magnetic force vector cannot be parallel to the plane formed by a particle's velocity and the magnetic field. Participants reference the properties of the cross product, noting that the magnetic force is perpendicular to both the velocity and magnetic field vectors. However, one user emphasizes the challenge of proving this without relying on the definition of the cross product. They argue that the behavior of charged particles in magnetic fields is based on empirical observations, making it difficult to derive such a proof without foundational principles. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in demonstrating this relationship in magnetic force dynamics.
humanallien
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
here is the problem:

prove that the vector of the magnetic force cannot be parallel to the plane that contains the vector of the particle's velocity and magnetic field.

someone please help me to solve this, thanks so much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
humanallien said:
here is the problem:

prove that the vector of the magnetic force cannot be parallel to the plane that contains the vector of the particle's velocity and magnetic field.

someone please help me to solve this, thanks so much for your time.

By definition of cross product you have both

\vec v \cdot \vec v \times \vec B = 0

and

\vec B \cdot \vec v \times \vec B = 0

which say that both \vec v and \vec B are perpendicular to \vec F = \vec v \times \vec B.
 
thanks for your advice, but it does not help me with the problem because I have to assume that I do not know the definition of F = v X B for the prove. Therefore, I want to proof that the force vector is NOT parallel to the plane without considering the definition of the croos product
 
Since the fundamental behavior of charged particles interacting with a magnetic field comes only from observation (Thomson, Lorentz, etc.) it would seem unlikely that you could "prove" the result by other means. It would be like attempting to prove the electric force on a charged particle acts parallel to the electric field - without invoking Coulomb's Law. Good luck!
 
Back
Top