Determinant of a special conformal transformation

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I am working through Chapter 4 of Francesco, Mathieu and Senechal's CFT book (https://www.amazon.com/dp/038794785X/?tag=pfamazon01-20). Equation 4.52 states that for a special conformal transformation

\left|\frac{\partial\textbf{x'}}{\partial\textbf{x}}\right| = \frac{1}{(1-2(\textbf{b}\cdot\textbf{x})+b^2 x^2)^{d}}

where |.| denotes the determinant. I know that

x'^{\mu} = \frac{x^\mu - b^\mu x^2}{1-2 b\cdot x + b^2 x^2}

How does this give the determinant above? I would appreciate a hint.

Thanks in advance!
 
  • Like
Likes baba26
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
Hi,

I am working through Chapter 4 of Francesco, Mathieu and Senechal's CFT book (https://www.amazon.com/dp/038794785X/?tag=pfamazon01-20). Equation 4.52 states that for a special conformal transformation

\left|\frac{\partial\textbf{x'}}{\partial\textbf{x}}\right| = \frac{1}{(1-2(\textbf{b}\cdot\textbf{x})+b^2 x^2)^{d}}

where |.| denotes the determinant. I know that

x'^{\mu} = \frac{x^\mu - b^\mu x^2}{1-2 b\cdot x + b^2 x^2}

How does this give the determinant above? I would appreciate a hint.

Thanks in advance!

Note that

\frac{\partial x'^{\mu}}{\partial x^\nu} = \frac{\delta^\mu_\nu}{1-2 b\cdot x + b^2 x^2} + f_\nu(x) b^\mu + g^\mu(x) b_\nu,

where ##f,g## can be easily determined. If you go ahead and express the determinant in your favorite way (using epsilon symbols is most straightforward), you'll find

$$\left| \frac{\partial x'^{\mu}}{\partial x^\nu} \right| = \frac{1}{(1-2 b\cdot x + b^2 x^2)^d} + \epsilon_{\mu_1\mu_2\cdots} b^{\mu_1} b^{\mu_2} \cdots + \cdots.$$

I haven't specified all of the extra terms, but you can see that they always involve antisymmetric combinations of ##b^{\mu_1} b^{\mu_2}## (and similar products with factors of ##f,g##). But all of these terms vanish because products like ##b^{\mu_1} b^{\mu_2}## are actually symmetric.
 
  • Like
Likes baba26
Make use of the fact that conformal transformations form a group. Write your special transformation as a product of translations and inversions. It's determinant will then be the product of the determinants of the individual transformations.
 
fzero said:
I haven't specified all of the extra terms, but you can see that they always involve antisymmetric combinations of ##b^{\mu_1} b^{\mu_2}## (and similar products with factors of ##f,g##). But all of these terms vanish because products like ##b^{\mu_1} b^{\mu_2}## are actually symmetric.

Bill_K said:
Make use of the fact that conformal transformations form a group. Write your special transformation as a product of translations and inversions. It's determinant will then be the product of the determinants of the individual transformations.

Thank you fzero and Bill_K. I figured it out using the idea suggested by fzero. But Bill_K, what is the role of b in the translation*inversion product? I remember reading that a special conformal transformation can be decomposed this way, but I didn't quite understand it in the first place. Could you please elaborate.
 
1. Invert: x^a \rightarrow x^a/x^2.
2. Add b: x^a/x^2 \rightarrow x^a/x^2 + b^a = (x^a + b^a x^2)/x^2.
3. Invert again: (x^a + b^a x^2)/x^2 \rightarrow \frac{x^2 (x^a + b^a x^2)}{(x + b x^2)^2} = \frac{x^a + b^a x^2}{1 + 2 bx + x^2}.
 
Physics Monkey said:
1. Invert: x^a \rightarrow x^a/x^2.
2. Add b: x^a/x^2 \rightarrow x^a/x^2 + b^a = (x^a + b^a x^2)/x^2.
3. Invert again: (x^a + b^a x^2)/x^2 \rightarrow x^2 (x^a + b^a x^2)/((x + b x^2)^2 = (x^a + b^a x^2)/(1 + 2 bx + x^2).

Thanks. I'm so stupid -- I didn't think of breaking it down this way, and it totally slipped my mind that operation 1 is the inversion step.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
790
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top