Are the Fourier transforms of a function and its inverse related?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the Fourier transform of a function and its inverse. It suggests that while a one-to-one function uniquely determines its inverse, there is no straightforward formula connecting their Fourier transforms. The participants agree that the transforms are related through this indirect relationship, but the interaction of the Fourier transform with function composition is complex. Ultimately, no simple or direct relationship exists between the Fourier transforms of a function and its inverse. The topic highlights the intricacies of Fourier analysis in relation to function inverses.
john1989
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

Does anyone know if there is a relation between the Fourier transform of a function and the Fourier transform of the inverse function

in summary
FT[f(x)] ?= FT[f-1(x)]

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Logically they must be related because a 1-1 function uniquely determines its own inverse. Therefore, the Fourier transforms are at least related through this indirect relationship. However, I don't think there is any reasonable formula to relate the two. The Fourier transform does not interact with composition of functions in a simple way.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Get the time axis right in an inverse Fast Fourier Transform
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Can an inverse function of a special cubic function be found?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Calculating the inverse of a function involving the error function
Replies
3
Views
2K
I What are the applications of inverses of vector functions?
Replies
17
Views
3K
I The precise relationship between Fourier series and Fourier transform
Replies
12
Views
3K
I Interpretation of the Fourier Transform of a Cauchy Distribution
Replies
4
Views
3K
B How to calculate the Fourier transform of sin(a*t)*exp(-t/b) ?
Replies
7
Views
2K
A Fourier series approximation of a discontinuous eddy function
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Inverse Functions vs Inverse Relations
Replies
4
Views
3K
MHB How do trigonometric functions and their inverses relate to each other?
Replies
16
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top