Point at which a line intersects a plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparkzbarca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Plane Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a general solution for the parameter T in the equation of a line intersecting a plane defined by Ax + By + Cz = D. The user has derived the line's parametric equations using two points, p1 and p2, but struggles to isolate T in the context of the plane equation. A suggestion is made to group terms involving T and constants, leading to a simplified form that can be solved for T. The user is encouraged to rearrange the equation to achieve this goal. The conversation highlights the mathematical process of solving for intersection points in 3D space.
sparkzbarca
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So i know the equation of a plane.

Ax + By +Cz = D

Normal is the normal vector to the plane.

A = normal.x
B = normal.y
C = normal.z
p1 and p2 are 2 points on the line (which will intercept a plane at some point)
the .x and .y and .z refer to there respective components of the vector.

X = (p2.x - p1.x)* T + p1.x
Y = (p2.y - p1.y)* T + p1.y
Z = (p2.z - p1.z)* T + p1.z

I also know what D equals I solved for that by moving stuff around

The problem is a need a general solution for T.

It should be something like

A ((p2.x - p1.x) * T + p1.x)) + B ((p2.y - p1.y) * T + p1.y)) + C ((p2.z - p1.z) * T + p1.z)) = D

Except isolated for T (I believe)

In case your curious this is for a programming function. Thats why I'm using nothing but variables.

I can solve for every equation but T, while I can solve for T by myself given specific numbers I am not sure how to isolate it even if I expand out the equation to stuff like

Ap2.x - Ap1.x * AT + Ap1.x ...

I'm thinking maybe I am going down the wrong path here or something.

Any help would be much appreciated. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have p1 p2 and n?
Why not group terms in T ... then the equation has form: \lambda T + \mu = D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top