On the quantum theory of radiation

A_B
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In section 3 of Einstein's "On the quantum theory of radiation" Einstein says equations (8) and (9) follow from (7) and Wien's displacement law. I don't see how that is. For example, if we replace (8) by
<br /> \frac{A_m^n}{B_m^n} = \alpha \frac{\nu}{T} \nu^3<br />
All conditions still seem to hold. What am I missing?

Also, can somebody point me to a derivation of Wien's displacement law that does not assume Planck's formula?


Thank you,

A_B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He says A and B are constants which are "characteristic for the combination of indices considered". The indices referred to are εm and εn, the initial and final energy of the state, and in particular the energy difference εm - εn, that is, the frequency ν of the emitted radiation. They cannot depend on the temperature T. So the numerator A/B must be a function of ν only, and from Wien's Law it must be proportional to ν3, giving us Eq 8.

Likewise from Wien's Law the denominator must be a function of ν/T, which implies Eq 9.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top