How Does Normal Force Change as a Car Accelerates on a Banked Curve?

AI Thread Summary
As a car accelerates on a banked curve, the normal force increases to balance the weight of the car and provide the necessary centripetal force. Initially, when the car is static, the normal force is less than the weight, with friction acting perpendicular to the car. As the car moves, the vertical component of the normal force increases until it equals the gravitational force, while the horizontal component provides the centripetal force. The interaction between the car's wheels and the ground is crucial, as the car must exert a force against the ground to change direction, prompting an increase in the normal force. Understanding this mechanism is essential for analyzing forces in motion on banked curves.
Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
hello good morning. Let look at the two diagram.
(back view)

In STATIC, a car is remauning static at a bank curve and its force diagram is as follows. for this case, the normal force is smaller than the weight of the car and friction exists in the directiin perpendicular to car.

In MOTION, the car is moving into the screen and is surrounding a banked curve. now what i am so surprised with is that THE MECHANISM OF FORCE CHANGING. if we inspect a car changes it state from.diagram 1 to 2, we wil actually realize that the normal force gradually increases until its vertical component Ncos(∠) is equal to the mg and balances the weight of the car. meanwhile there is an unbalanced component that causes centripetal force ,Nsin(∠) . Can anyone explain to me the actual mechanism of this changes in normal force?? or correct me if i am wrong.
 

Attachments

  • 1365434381196.jpg
    1365434381196.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you not include the friction force in the "motion" diagram?

You mean you start with the car stationary on a banked curve and then it accelerates around the curve?
In order to accelerate the car must experience a net unbalanced force. The mechanism for this is the wheels contact with the ground. As it accelerates around the corner, it will have an increasing centripetal component - which comes from the reaction from the ground ... so the normal force must increase.

The mechanism is that the car has to push against the ground in order to change direction and the ground is fixed in place so it must push back - just the same as the normal force knows exactly how hard to push on the car in the stationary case.

Another way to think about this is to consider what would happen if the ground did not push hard enough against the car to make it turn.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top