Polarised (polarized) light; EM explanation.

AI Thread Summary
Linearly polarized light can effectively differentiate between dielectric and metallic facets of a rock specimen by analyzing reflection and transmission properties. When an electromagnetic wave encounters a dielectric, some light is transmitted while some is reflected, whereas metals absorb energy up to a certain depth. This means that using polarized light at normal incidence will result in less reflection from dielectrics compared to metals. A simple sketch could illustrate the differing interactions of light with these materials. Overall, measuring the reflection of linearly polarized light can confirm the dielectric nature of the facets.
Roodles01
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Facets of a rock specimen sparkle brightly
In terms of electromagnetism how can I show that a linearly polarised light source can be used to determine that the facets are dielectric rather than metallic?

Should have to do with scattering, but not sure whether it could be explained with a dispersion relation, phase speed of light, or . . . . . .


Is there a simple sketch I could produce to show how?

Help, please.
Thank youi
 
Science news on Phys.org
What is the difference between EM wave interactions with a dielectric vs metal interface?
 
When an EM wave encounters a dielectric some of the wave is transmitted & some reflected, as with a metal, too.

When encountering a metal the normal part of the EM wave will absorb a small amount of energy, up to the skin depth, but a dielectric will allow the normal incidence of the wave through as a polarised wave whilst the rest will be reflected.

Hmm!
To me this sounds like if I use linearly polarised light normal to the surface of the facets then measure reflection then there would be less reflection from the dielectric than the metal.
 
... and you didn't need me after all :)
 
Back
Top