A New Generation of Atomic Clocks

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
795
This was just posted today, and looks interesting
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.1137.pdf
A New Generation of Atomic Clocks: Accuracy and Stability at the 10-18 Level
B. J. Bloom et al
The exquisite control exhibited over quantum states of individual particles has revolutionized the field of precision measurement, as exemplified by the most accurate atomic clock realized in single trapped ions. Whereas many-atom lattice clocks have shown advantages in measurement precision over trapped-ion clocks, their accuracy has remained 20 times worse. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that a many-atom system achieves accuracy (6x10-18) better than a single ion-based clock, with vastly reduced averaging times (3000 s). This is the first time a single clock has achieved the best performance in all three key ingredients necessary for consideration as a primary standard - stability, reproducibility, and accuracy. This work paves the way for future experiments to integrate many-body quantum state engineering into the frontiers of quantum metrology, creating exciting opportunities to advance precision beyond the standard quantum limit. Improved frequency standards will have impact to a wide range of fields from the realization of the SI units, the development of quantum sensors, to precision tests of the fundamental laws of nature.
--- National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you can see, we're starting to come up against the wall with atomic clocks. The next step will be nuclear clocks, built around the Th-229m isomer. This is predicted to have a Q-value about a thousand times better than the best atomic clocks, and much better environmental isolation since its a nuclear (not atomic) transition. The "gamma" from this transition is very, very soft - it's actually in the ultraviolet.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The "gamma" from this transition is very, very soft - it's actually in the ultraviolet.

Well that's nice!
 
Vanadium 50 said:
As you can see, we're starting to come up against the wall with atomic clocks. The next step will be nuclear clocks, built around the Th-229m isomer. This is predicted to have a Q-value about a thousand times better than the best atomic clocks, and much better environmental isolation since its a nuclear (not atomic) transition. The "gamma" from this transition is very, very soft - it's actually in the ultraviolet.

One problem that also needs to be solved is time transfer. There are now several experiments that have demonstrated clocks with accuracies in the 5e-18 range. However, the clocks are not very useful unless you can transfer the time; current satellite based systems are nowhere near good enough and even using dedicated fibre you would struggle to maintain this accuracy; especially if you want to replace the Cs fountains used for the UTC.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top