What is the smallest possible sum for a labeled 63-gon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Numeriprimi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves assigning the numbers 1 or -1 to the vertices of a regular 63-gon and calculating the sum of products for its sides. The goal is to minimize the non-negative sum of these products while adhering to specific constraints regarding the number of edges with different and same numbers. The optimal solution is achieved when 30 edges have different numbers, resulting in a minimum sum of 3. A suggested labeling that achieves this result is ((1,1,-1,-1)^{15},1,1,1). The discussion highlights the mathematical reasoning behind the constraints and the solution.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Hello.
When I was in Mathematical Olympiad in our district, I got a example which I can not solve :-(
Now, I am very interested in, how to do it. I don't know, my brother - teacher don't know, my friends don't know. I think you can solve it :-) Can you help me? It isn't my homework and I really don't know how to do it easily (don't draw a 63-gon :-D)

To each of vertexes of regular 63-gon assign one of the numbers 1 or -1.
To each of his sides ascribe the product of numbers of her boundaring vertexes. Then add all numbers at sides. What is the smallest possible non.negative value of this sum?

Thank you very much and sorry for my bad English.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This wouldn't have been an IMO question.
 
You have d edges with different numbers on the vertices (product =-1) and s edges with the same number on each vertex (product =1), and you're constrained to have
- s+d=63;
- d an even number (because of the cyclical arrangement);
- d\leq s.
You want to make s-d as small as possible, subject to the above constraints, i.e. \min_{d\in\{0,...,63\}} [(63-d) - d] \text{ subject to } d \text{ even}, \enspace d\leq 63 -d. It's straightforward to check that the solution to the above problem is 3.

Indeed, the constraints require that d be an even number which is \leq 31.5, the largest such number being 30. Since minimizing 63-2d just amounts to maximizing d, the above problem is solved by d=30, which yields s-d=33-30=3.

If you want an example of a labeling that attains this, try labeling the vertices ((1,1,-1,-1)^{15},1,1,1).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top