Drude model electron interaction

charbon
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
In every source I've checked so far, we make the assumption that we can neglect electron-electron interaction in this model but they always fail to give any reason to answer why this is plausible. Does anyone know how physicists convinced themselves of this at the time and even now (other than the fact that it just works of course!)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The model that Drude originally proposed was a lot crazier than what is now usually meant by "Drude's model". In it, "electrons" were both positive and negative, plus they could carry a multiple of elementary charge e. Oh, and they did not have any mass (but they had an "apparent mass"). He then said that the question why those "electrons" don't get stuck together and form "neutral aether-points" "explains itself" once the kinetic energy of the "electrons" exceeds some certain level. The collisions between them were what determined their mean free path, on which the entire theory hinges.
 
charbon said:
In every source I've checked so far, we make the assumption that we can neglect electron-electron interaction in this model but they always fail to give any reason to answer why this is plausible. Does anyone know how physicists convinced themselves of this at the time and even now (other than the fact that it just works of course!)?

The answer is known under the name "Landau fermi liquid theory":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_liquid_theory

Basically, electron-electron collisions can only be neglected in a small region around the Fermi surface due. For these electrons, momentum conservation and Pauli principle prohibits scattering.
The difficult part is to show that, if electron-electron interactions are taken into account, there is still a Fermi surface.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top