Amplitude modulation - why is ωc ωm necessary?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of the condition ωc >> ωm in amplitude modulation (AM). Participants explore the implications of this condition for achieving effective modulation, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the necessity of the condition ωc >> ωm for effective amplitude modulation, seeking clarification on its implications.
  • Others reference a lesson that states two conditions for good modulation: M < 1 and ωc >> ωm, with the latter suggested to be at least ten times greater.
  • A participant suggests that if ωm approaches ωc, it may lead to distortion of the modulating waveform, prompting further questions about the consequences of this scenario.
  • Some participants argue that while the formula for AM can apply broadly, practical considerations such as channel frequency response and sideband behavior complicate the situation.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding the spectral implications and graphical representations may provide deeper insights into the modulation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of the condition ωc >> ωm, but the reasons and implications for this requirement remain contested and not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the practical implications of the condition ωc >> ωm, particularly in relation to channel characteristics and the behavior of sidebands. There are references to graphical tools and calculations that could aid understanding, but no consensus on their availability or utility is reached.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in the principles of amplitude modulation, particularly those exploring the technical requirements and implications of modulation conditions.

karakov
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
amplitude modulation -- why is ωc >> ωm necessary?

i just want to ask why is ωc >> ωm is necessary for a good amplitude modulation
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
karakov said:
i just want to ask why is ωc >> ωm is necessary for a good amplitude modulation

Welcome to the PF.

Where have you seen that condition referred to (textbook/web page/lecture notes/etc.)? Is it discussed there?
 
we admit that condition . but why??
 
karakov said:
we admit that condition . but why??

What do you mean? You use that condition in some calculations? Can you show us the calculations?
 
i have in a lesson about amplitude modulation :
technically to have a good modulation .two conditions should be considered : M< 1 and ωc >> ωm (at least ten times )
 
karakov said:
i have in a lesson about amplitude modulation :
technically to have a good modulation .two conditions should be considered : M< 1 and ωc >> ωm (at least ten times )

Correct. Can you see why M < 1 is necessary to avoid distortion of the modulating waveform that rides on the carrier waveform? There are good pictures that you can find with a Google Images search on Amplitude Modulation.

The requirement that ωc >> ωm is a little more subtle. Think about what the modulated carrier looks like when ωm gets close to ωc. What happens if they are equal?
 
it is going to lead to distortion of the modulating waveform ?!
 
karakov said:
it is going to lead to distortion of the modulating waveform ?!

Yes, when you try to demodulate it with a simple rectifier, the recovered signal will be distorted compared to the original modulating signal. With a little Google searching, you may be able to find a graphical waveform calculator to show the distortion as the two frequencies get too close...
 
I really can't find wavesform calculator .so tell me what happens ?
 
  • #10
karakov said:
I really can't find wavesform calculator .so tell me what happens ?

You didn't look for very long...
 
  • #11
ok whatever just tell me what happens ?? please.
 
  • #12
karakov said:
ok whatever just tell me what happens ?? please.

No, this is your schoolwork, and you should be able to figure this out. Especially if it is part of an assignment, we can give you hints, but we are not allowed to do your work for you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
karakov said:
i just want to ask why is ωc >> ωm is necessary for a good amplitude modulation

It depends on what you mean by "good".

You can AM 'anything onto anything', in fact; the formula still applies. This question is both theoretical and practical, I think. If the modulating frequency is higher than that of the carrier, where would the sidebands turn up? What sort of sense would a simple demodulator make of that? (You might be familiar with the subject of Sampling and aliasing, which is along the same lines)
A practical consideration, (and practical ones are sometimes difficult to find in textbooks) is that it is difficult to ensure that the usable pass band of a channel will be better than, say 10% of the carrier frequency. If the frequency response of the channel is asymmetrical then what will happen to the sidebands? (Amplitude response is the easy one to consider but Phase response will also be relevant)
These comments should be enough to help you come up with a reasonable answer to your question. I suggest you should do some thinking about the problem before putting values into a calculator. A calculator doesn't tell you anything about why things happen but some sketches of the spectrum could give you some serious insight here..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K