Phase modulation and intermodulation anomaly *Plots inside*

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the modeling of a two-tone signal using MATLAB, specifically focusing on the effects of non-linear transfer functions in amplifiers. The two sinusoids at 20 Hz and 21 Hz demonstrate expected intermodulation products when only amplitude modulation is applied. However, when phase modulation is introduced based on input power, the fifth-order intermodulation products disappear, indicating a significant alteration in the output spectrum. The user seeks clarification on the implications of phase modulation in this context and its relationship to amplitude modulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MATLAB scripting for signal processing
  • Knowledge of non-linear transfer functions in amplifiers
  • Familiarity with intermodulation distortion and its measurement
  • Concept of phase modulation versus amplitude modulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore MATLAB's signal processing toolbox for advanced modeling techniques
  • Research the principles of intermodulation distortion in non-linear systems
  • Study the effects of phase modulation on signal integrity in communication systems
  • Investigate methods for pre-correction in signal processing to mitigate non-linear effects
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, signal processing specialists, and researchers involved in communications and amplifier design who are looking to understand the complexities of phase and amplitude modulation in non-linear systems.

Natalie Johnson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I have a MATLAB script for modelling a two tone signal (a sum of two sinusoids) going through a non linear transfer function (such as an amplifier). The amplitude of a signal is amplified non linearly, and also the phase is modified depending on the input power of the signal.

The two sinusoids used are at 20 Hz and 21 Hz.

With just amplitude modulation, the output spectrum looks as expected (first two plots) Its non linear so 3rd order and fifth order intermods can be seen around the frequency of the two sinusoids, as well as harmonics. I know the amplitude modulation is correct because I obtain the correct third order intercept for the amplifier model. Upper graphs are in volts, lower graphs in dB Watts

FDklT.png


However, when phase is adjusted depending on the input signal power, the spectrum looks like this... and my fifth order intermods are lost (again upper graph in volts, lower graph in dBW)

bGrNI.png


I am not confident with the explanation of this and was hoping someone with a trained eye can assist please

How its coded --> My script looks at each point on the input signal, reads its amplitude and adds a phase adjustment to it during reconstruction of the signal, as shown in the phase transfer plot below (which shows the effect the equipment will have on any signal going through it). So if the amplitude (input power) of the signal is -70 dBW then a phase of 0.01 radians is added to the reconstructed signal at that exact point... then it looks at the next sample point and adds a phase to that. So if the amplitude of the wave is at -70dBW then the reconstructed waveform is cos(2*pi*f + 0.01)

Confident I have not made any mistakes with unit conversion (again because third order intercept is correct).

hgxKS.png
 

Attachments

  • FDklT.png
    FDklT.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 715
  • bGrNI.png
    bGrNI.png
    19.2 KB · Views: 681
  • hgxKS.png
    hgxKS.png
    5 KB · Views: 614
Engineering news on Phys.org
If I understand correctly, for the first case there is amplitude modulation and for the second case phase modulation.
For phase modulation, the envelope remains constant, and it can therefore be passed through non linear systems without creating additional side frequencies.
 
tech99 said:
If I understand correctly, for the first case there is amplitude modulation and for the second case phase modulation.
For phase modulation, the envelope remains constant, and it can therefore be passed through non linear systems without creating additional side frequencies.
That's how I read it. Unfortunately the description of the process is not totally clear (or at least it isn't described in terms recognisable to me`).
@Natalie Johnson I don't understand how you seem to be associating two tone amplification with amplitude modulation. AM is a very specific form of modulation and there is one carrier plus sidebands.
Could you give us some context for these calculations please? Are you just trying to produce a signal that is more impervious to nonlinearity? Is this basically a form of pre-correction?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K