Measuring time involves inherent uncertainty, as all measurements carry some degree of error. Current technology allows time measurement to within 1 part in 4000 trillion, but achieving absolute certainty is impossible. The accuracy of timing events is often compromised by the human reaction time when initiating measurements. Additionally, the concept of measuring time itself is complex; we can only measure the passage of time rather than time as an entity. The strontium atomic clock represents the pinnacle of precision in timekeeping today.
#1
Quarlep
257
4
Does any uncertainty when measuring time?
Can we measure time definitely(hundred percent correct)
All measurements have uncertainty. Currently we can measure time to within 1 part in 4000 trillion. So it is pretty accurate but it will never be perfectly certain.
You can measure the time between two events quite accurately within a clock but getting the events "to the clock" without messing up the timing can be problematic. As an analogy... A stopwatch can be accurate to 100th of a second but the human sending the start/stop signal to the stopwatch may have much slower reaction and operation times.
Interesting to read some of the issues involved in trying to measure the time it takes Neutrinos to travel 450 miles..
We can only measure the passage of time, but not time itself.
The limit of measurement is the limit by the "clock" or timebase you use and the mechanism buy which you tag the start and stop of an event. Right now the strontium atomic clock is the most accurate timebase we have. You might do a search for that if you want actual numbers.
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
i want to just test a linear generator with galvanometer , the magnet is N28 and the wire (Cu) is of 0.6mm thikness and 10m long , but galvanometer dont show anthing ,
The core is PLA material (3d printed)
The magnet size if 28mm * 10mm * 5mm
If the universe is fundamentally probabilistic, and all possible outcomes are realized in some branch of the multiverse, does that invalidate the concept of scientific inquiry? If knowledge is merely a description of one particular branch of reality, does it have any inherent value?