Is 1+2+3+4+... equal to -1/12? A mind-boggling proof!

  • Thread starter Thread starter fargoth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversial claim that the infinite series 1+2+3+4+... equals -1/12, as presented in a YouTube video. Participants express confusion regarding the validity of this claim in light of established rules about series convergence, particularly that a series diverges if its partial sums do not converge. Concerns are raised about the implications of summing strictly positive numbers resulting in a negative value, which contradicts basic mathematical principles. The original poster questions the legitimacy of the proof and seeks clarification on where the misunderstanding lies. Ultimately, the consensus leans toward skepticism about the claim's accuracy.
fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
I've see this neat proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-d9...eature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_3085392237 (for some reason the youtube tag didn't work in preview...)
And now I don't see how what I've learned about series convergence is true...
I've been told that if a_n > b_n \forall n then \sum a_n > \sum b_n therefore, if \sum b_n is divergent then, \sum a_n must be too.
Also, If the partial sum diverges, the series is said to be divergent, isn't it?
And what about a_n \neq 0 for n that tends to infinity?
So many ways I could show this series diverges, yet he show it's equal to -1/12?

Where am I, or is he, wrong?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think this cannot be true. The sum of all natural numbers up to N equals (as also shown in the end of the video) ## N(N+1)/2 ##. This obviously goes to infinity as N goes to infinity. And of course there is also no way how strictly positive numbers can add up to give a negative result.
 
That's what I was saying :)
So where is he wrong?
 
And as this link was posted we can safely close the thread.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top