What is the proof for 1+4+9+16+....=0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Qemikal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the sum of the series 1 + 4 + 9 + 16 + ..., which represents the sum of the squares of natural numbers. Participants explore the concept of divergent series and the challenges in proving that this series equals zero. The conversation includes various approaches and methods related to assigning values to divergent series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention their attempts to demonstrate that 1 + 4 + 9 + 16 + ... equals zero, referencing their experience with divergent series.
  • Others argue that certain manipulations of infinite series are mathematically nonsensical and can lead to arbitrary results.
  • A participant suggests a method of grouping terms in the series to illustrate how they might sum to zero, but this is met with skepticism regarding the validity of such operations.
  • There is a discussion about the concept of assigning values to divergent series, with references to methods like Ramanujan summation, though the specifics of these methods are not fully explored.
  • Some participants express a desire for clarity on how to correctly assign a value of zero to the series in question, indicating a need for a more rigorous explanation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the manipulations used to derive the sum of the series. There are competing views on the mathematical legitimacy of the operations performed on divergent series, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding how to appropriately assign values to such series.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the methods for handling divergent series and the potential for contradictions arising from the operations discussed. The conversation reflects a range of opinions on the mathematical treatment of these series without arriving at a definitive conclusion.

Qemikal
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Hello, I started to learn divergent series/sums, to practice I calculated some basic ones, you know: 1+2+3+4+5+6...= -1/12, but I really had problems when i tried to demonstrate that 1+4+9+16+...= 0(the sum of squares of natural numbers), I've tried to add, subtract etc, but I couldn't prove it, anyone here could help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Qemikal said:
I've tried to add, subtract etc, but I couldn't prove it, anyone here could help?
I guess you are referring to things like this? Forget it. Those calculations are mathematically nonsense, and you can get any result you like if you use those wrong operations. They are not the way those pseudo-limits are defined.

As an example, consider
1+1+1+1+... = X
Let's add 1 to both sides:
1+1+1+1+... = 1+X
But the left sides of both equations are identical, therefore, X=1+X.
Subtract X:
0=1.
 
mfb said:
I guess you are referring to things like this? Forget it. Those calculations are mathematically nonsense, and you can get any result you like if you use those wrong operations. They are not the way those pseudo-limits are defined.
I meant "adding" sums, like
S= 1-2+3-4+5... And adding S+S, it'll eventually give us 2*S=1-1+1-1+...
That's how we can assign values to these series => S= 1/4 (1-1+1-1+1...= 1/2 )
 
Qemikal said:
Hello, I started to learn divergent series/sums, to practice I calculated some basic ones, you know: 1+2+3+4+5+6...= -1/12, but I really had problems when i tried to demonstrate that 1+4+9+16+...= 0(the sum of squares of natural numbers), I've tried to add, subtract etc, but I couldn't prove it, anyone here could help?

What about ##1 + 4 + 9 + 16 \dots = 1 +(-1 + 1) + 4 + (-5 + 5) + 9 + (-14 + 14) + 16 + (-30 + 30) \dots = 0 + 5 - 5 + 14 - 14 + 30 - 30 + \dots = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 \dots = 0##

Although:

##1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 \dots = 1 + (-1 + 1) + 2 + (-3 + 3) + 4 + (-7 + 7) + 5 + (-12 + 12) \dots) = 0##

Looks like they all sum to 0.
 
Qemikal said:
That's how we can assign values to these series => S= 1/4 (1-1+1-1+1...= 1/2 )
You can, but those values are meaningless. See the example I put in my post, you can easily make contradictions like that.

It is not what mathematicians do to assign values to those series!
 
mfb said:
As an example, consider
1+1+1+1+... = X
Let's add 1 to both sides:
1+1+1+1+... = 1+X
But the left sides of both equations are identical, therefore, X=1+X.
Subtract X:
0=1.
I wrote that I add sums, in general, mathematicians do that, but in this example you added 1 to an infinite series that's wrong, infinity + 1 = infinity.

As written in that wikipedia article mathematician 'assign' the values to series, maybe equal is much said, but how to assign 0 to the 1+4+9+... would be a better formulation of the question.

This method of assigning is used in many papers(including string theory).
A video from Numberphile would explain visually what I mean:
but I would like to know how to do this for 1+4+9+... series.
 
Qemikal said:
I wrote that I add sums, in general, mathematicians do that
Not in the way you wrote here, no.
Qemikal said:
but in this example you added 1 to an infinite series that's wrong
That is my point, the operations you do with the series are wrong.
Qemikal said:
As written in that wikipedia article mathematician 'assign' the values to series, maybe equal is much said, but how to assign 0 to the 1+4+9+... would be a better formulation of the question.
There are various methods, in this particular case it is Ramanujan summation. More options (which can lead to different answers for the same series) are listed here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD
mfb said:
Not in the way you wrote here, no
How would be a correct way to write it?
mfb said:
There are various methods, in this particular case it is Ramanujan summation.
kkFr8UE.jpg

I would like to know the steps he applied to be able to assign 0 to the middle series.
[PLAIN]http://QUOTE="mfb, post: 5498284, member: 405866"]Not in the way you wrote here, no[/QUOTE] [/PLAIN]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Qemikal said:
I would like to know the steps he applied to be able to assign 0 to the middle series.
See the section above, "Summation".
 
  • #11
As mfb said,
Those calculations are mathematically nonsense
This misuse of divergent series has been discussed numerous times here at PF.
Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K