Can the Anti-log of a Number Be Negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yashbhatt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the anti-logarithm of a number can be negative, emphasizing that logarithms are not defined for negative values. It highlights that while square roots can yield both positive and negative results, the logarithm's definition restricts its output to positive values unless absolute values are considered. The conversation suggests that context determines which values are applicable, implying that both positive and negative values may be relevant in certain scenarios. Additionally, it notes that using a negative base could lead to negative or complex antilogs. Ultimately, the anti-logarithm is primarily defined for positive values unless specified otherwise.
Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13
If we accept both positive and negative values for the square root of a number, then can the anti-log of a number be negative?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You should be able to work that out from the definition of the logarithm (and what "antilogarithm" means.)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm#Inverse_function

if ##y=b^x## then ##\log_b(y)=x##

##\text{antilog}_b x (= b^x) = y##

You want to know if y can be negative.

Presumably your concern is that the log is not defined for negative values of y.
It is a bit like the surd for square roots ... to account for negative values, define: ##\log_b|y|=x##, i.e. take the absolute value. Then there are two possible values going the other way.
Otherwise you are implicitly requiring a positive value for y as the original input.
 
So, is it like we have both positive and negative values but we keep only positive values?
 
Like that - which values we use depends on the context.
Maybe we will need both of them.

BTW: it is possible to have a negative base ... that can give a negative or a complex antilog.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top