How can I make these series equal to each other?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hddd123456789
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of finding operations to make two series, S1 and S2, equal. S1 is defined as e and also expressed as (1+a)^b, while S2 starts with an infinite term due to the factorial of -1. Participants suggest exploring the series further, particularly by setting k=1 and addressing the first terms separately. However, it is noted that there is no similar closed form for S2. The conversation highlights the complexities of manipulating series and factorials in mathematical exploration.
hddd123456789
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to see if there is an operation or set of operations I can perform on S1 so that it equals S2. I've just been going in circles and it seems I just don't have enough knowledge of how factorials behave in series to crack this. Any hints would be much appreciated.

Hope this makes sense.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • equations.jpg
    equations.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 463
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can't. The first term of s2 is (-1)! which is infinite.
 
Thanks for the reply; would it help to set k=1 for both series, and deal with the first terms separately? And forgot to mention that S1=e.
 
Last edited:
S1 = (1+a)b. I suggest you try to understand what this is about.
 
Sorry, you mean understand the problem or the equation in your post? I know that S1 equals (1+a)^b as well as e. But I guess there isn't a similar closed form of S2.

As for the problem, this is just some "fun" exploration of numbers I made up.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top