For all numbers n, N* = 32-n. (n*)*

  • Thread starter Thread starter danacarr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of N* = 32 - n and the interpretation of (n*)*. Participants debate whether n* is equivalent to 32 - n and how the operation "*" should be understood. One interpretation suggests that performing the operation twice leads to n, while another considers the possibility of exponents, proposing that n* could also represent 1/32^n. Clarification is requested to ensure accurate understanding of the definitions and operations involved. The conversation highlights the need for precise definitions in mathematical expressions.
danacarr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you calculate:

For all numbers n, N* = 32-n.

(n*)*
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is "N" the same as "n"?

If you mean that n* is defined as 32- n, then "*" just means "subtract n from 32". Doing it twice, (n*)*= (32-n)*= 32- (32-n)= n.
If that is not what you mean then I think you need to clarify.

Hmm, but that doesn't have any thing to do with exponents. Do you mean that n* is defined as 32-n? That is, of course, the same as /frac{1}{32^n}. Doing that twice,
(n*)*= 32^{-\frac{1}{32^n}}
which is 1 over the 32n root of 32.

I have a feeling that is also not what you meant. Please clarify!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top