Prove that of a,b,c are natural numbers

AI Thread Summary
To prove that if a, b, and c are natural numbers with gcd(a, c) = 1 and b divides c, then gcd(a, b) = 1, one must start by understanding the definition of the greatest common divisor (gcd) and its properties. The gcd of two numbers is the largest positive integer that divides both numbers without leaving a remainder. Given that b divides c, any common divisor of a and b must also divide c, but since gcd(a, c) = 1, a shares no common factors with c. Therefore, the only common divisor between a and b can be 1, leading to the conclusion that gcd(a, b) = 1. This establishes the required proof.
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I would greatly appreciate if someone just at least put me in the right direction with this. I have to prove this:

Prove that of a,b,c are natural numbers, gcd(a,c) = 1 and b divides c, then gcd(a,b) = 1.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Write down the defintion of gcd, what properties does gcd have, in particular gdc(x,y) and dividing x and y. Consider if d is a divisor of b then is it a divisor of c?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top